tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post7029169611987142178..comments2007-12-24T14:44:46.971-05:00Brian Burkenoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-66433339051981141302007-12-24T14:44:00.000-05:002007-12-24T14:44:00.000-05:00

This is great stuff! Keep up the great work. You've just got to love Garrard!Could it be possible to have the ratings without the rushing being involved? Or is there an easy way to take a way the rushing from the equation? I would like to know who are the best pure passers.

Samponoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-8740714740390683842007-12-24T08:02:00.000-05:002007-12-24T08:02:00.000-05:00

"Romo has more ints, twice as many fumbles, and a lot more sack yds."Yes this is true, however Romo has a higher y/att number.I am not sure how to go about looking at this, but I will take the higher risk higher reward guy every time.The importance of throwing for 8.0+ yards per pass cannot be underestimated.Its pretty hard to find a team that threw for over 8 y/att and did not score a bunch of

coldbikemessengernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-88369846011397746072007-12-24T00:08:00.000-05:002007-12-24T00:08:00.000-05:00

Are you sure? What if Anderson had TO or Barber to pass to? What if Romo played on the Browns?Romo has more ints, twice as many fumbles, and a lot more sack yds.But you could be right. I'm high on Romo. And I'd bet Anderson is having one of those one-year-wonder-flash-in-the-pan years, but I could be wrong.

Brian Burkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12371470711365236987noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-12721661429626615762007-12-23T23:42:00.000-05:002007-12-23T23:42:00.000-05:00

Brian, I rally like your work,but Anderson netter than Romo?No.Not in this life, not in the next.

coldbikemessengernoreply@blogger.com