tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post3941363569846010592..comments2008-05-01T11:38:09.742-04:00Brian Burkenoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-2646079242146684732008-05-01T11:38:00.000-04:002008-05-01T11:38:00.000-04:00

I believe full disclosure is called for, Mr. Burke...

j-monoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-26096680535620117062008-04-28T10:23:00.000-04:002008-04-28T10:23:00.000-04:00

I agree that the only way to grade draft experts is to look back at their draft boards, not at how many picks they got right this year. The problem is that you can have a guy (Tom Brady comes to mind) who really wasn't exceptionally good in college and didn't deserve to be drafted in the first few rounds, who turns out to be stellar. You can't fault the draft experts for missing that player

Doug Waltershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03064547652967055670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-40504230379801705182008-04-27T00:37:00.000-04:002008-04-27T00:37:00.000-04:00

Is that man Mayock? ;)It'd be easier if their was an archive of previous information. I can't access any of Kiper's old stuff even if it exists on ESPN. But seems like most of that stuff is burnt under cover of darkness the day after the draft.

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38600807.post-77547269761183538222008-04-25T19:54:00.000-04:002008-04-25T19:54:00.000-04:00

I agree. The 10 minutes or so where they say "That was a smart pick by the Patriots," or whatever just gets old. As does the fan cheering and jeering. I think they should focus on a few players that they think are underrated or will perform very well and follow them throughout the day. Maybe guys like Andre Woodson who performed poorly in all-star games but very well in college. But then

JTapphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17812390329612009756noreply@blogger.com